By
Emeka Kalu
culled from VANGUARD Tuesday, December 02, 2003
General Babangida ruled for eight years, making him the second longest
ruler in the nation's history.
NO
issue has dominated the political scene of late as much as the rumoured
candidature of former military president, General Ibrahim Babangida in
the 2007 presidential election.
As usual, General Ibrahim has shied
away from publicly acknowledging his interest in the election. Instead,
he has used every opportunity to admonish those canvassing for his
candidature to bid their time. Knowing General Babangida pretty well,
this admonition is nothing more than an endorsement of the activities of
his supporters.
What I personally find intriguing,
however, is the familiarity in the method of General Babangida in this
emerging political contest.
As a former military ruler, Babangida's
ascension to power in 1985 was hinged on the clamour of the Nigerian
citizenry for a change of government. This is the way of the military.
Lacking in morality to assume political leadership, the military readily
alludes to public resentment of the prevailing order to find their way
to power. That was the system of Gowon in the 1960s, Murtala Muhammed in
the 1970s and Buhari and Babangida in the 1980s and Sani Abacha in the
1990s. The question to ask is: why is Babangida adopting the now
worn-out style of some characters calling on him to contest election
since he is eminently qualified for that office?
Verdict of history
The answer, I guess, lies in the moral
burden that General Babangida bears. Having ruled Nigeria for eight
years, he is well placed to reflect on his years in power and conclude
on the verdict of history on his stewardship.
The activities of Babangida's
canvassers have attracted public interest because Babangida is not just
an ordinary Nigerian. At least, Abubakar Rimi, a veteran in the
presidential race has indicated his interest to contest the 2007
election, without generating any significant public interest. There has
also been a feeble attempt to test the political waters for the
presidential ambition of the governors of Sokoto and Bauchi States
without anyone taking significant note.
Babangida has attracted so much
interest because he remains a factor in Nigerian politics. In 1993, when
he was forced to vacate the presidential villa, he said he was ‘stepping
aside.' His increasing interest in the presidency once again, has only
confirmed that he meant every word in his ‘step aside' valedictory
speech.
But what else does Babangida has to
offer Nigeria? In our 43 years as an independent nation, General
Babangida ruled for eight years, making him the second longest ruler in
the nation's history, coming a close second to General Yakubu Gown who
held on to power for nine years.
General Babangida, more than any other
ruler in the nation's history, attempted fundamental changes in the
Nigerian landscape. His numerous economic, social and political programmes were designed to fundamentally affect the structure and
nature of the Nigerian state. His Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP)
for instance, was designed to fundamentally change the orientation and
structure of the Nigerian economy. The political transition programme,
another major plank of Babangida's social and economic reforms, was
expected to generate a new leadership that could take Nigeria to the
promise land.
Eight years of the implementation of
the programmes only worsened rather than solve the multi-dimensional
problems that Babangida inherited in 1985.
Violence on citizens
The economic programme unleashed the
worst violence on the citizenry than ever imagined. By the time
Babangida vacated office in 1993, the entire middle class in the
Nigerian political economy had been wiped out, leaving only two extremes
in the social structure, the extremely rich and the extremely poor.
The numerous economic measures
successfully forced many industries to their early death. Unemployment
soared beyond control as collapsed industries swelled the labour market.
Fresh university graduates were trapped in the labour market. The
situation was so bad that the then governor of Lagos State, Navy Captain
Mike Akhigbe introduced a policy to employ university graduates as
drivers of the Lagos State Transport Corporation!
A major contribution the Babangida
years added to the Nigerian lexicon was the phenomenon of "brain drain."
Nigerian youths and adults moved in drove to seek greener pastures
outside the shores of the country. Within years, most of our
institutions were groaning under the pangs of brain drain. I vividly
recall that Bisi Ojediran, a leading journalist, did a brilliant expose
on this phenomenon. His findings published in an essay aptly entitled
"brain drain leaves teaching hospitals in a sorry state" and published
in The Guardian of November 20, 1988 page 7 is worth
recalling. His words: ‘In July 1988, the Nigerian Medical and Dental
Council (NMDC) had withdrawn partial accreditation to the College of
Medicine, University of Maiduguri; the College of Health Sciences of the
University of Port Harcourt, Uthman Dan Fodio College of Medicine of the
University of Sokoto over lack of necessary personnel and facilities in
the training of medical doctors. In Port Harcourt for instance, staff
strength had fallen from 52 in 1983 to 40 that is,30 short of the
desired strength of 79. The only three consultants in the Department of
Radiology have left. In Pathology, out of the required 20, there are
only six. Surgery had five out of 10 required in anaesthesiology. By
1989, brain drain had caused the nation over 1,500 medical doctors and
nurses.
The same crisis confronted the
universities as lecturers moved in large numbers outside the country. At
the Ahmadu Bello University, 120 lecturers left between 1987 and 1988,
most of them in critical areas like Pharmacy, Mathematics, Medicine,
Microbiology, Industrial Design, Biochemistry and Biological Sciences.
This is only one of the social crises
that Babangida's Structural Adjustment Programme created. To be sure,
SAP was not the problem but the inability of the Babangida selectively
implemented the programme to sustain a patronage system. The
inconsistencies resulted in the dislocations that brought the Nigerian
economy to its knees and turned the entire country into one vast land of
misery.
By 1993, there was hardly any
difference between workers and the unemployed as wages became
increasingly incapable of caring for the needs of the workers.